Binding the same variable twice in a single form

• To: barmar@Think.COM
• Subject: Binding the same variable twice in a single form
• From: traveler@Think.COM (William R. Swanson)
• Date: Tue, 17 Apr 90 11:41:38 EDT
• cc: lgm@ihlpf.att.com, slug@Warbucks.AI.SRI.COM
• In-Reply-To: Barry Margolin's message of Mon, 16 Apr 90 17:18 EDT <19900416211800.9.BARMAR@OCCAM.THINK.COM>
• Sender: traveler@Think.COM

   Date: Mon, 16 Apr 90 17:18 EDT
   From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>

   Since the language doesn't specify what "the right thing" is, Symbolics
   is completely justified in implementing inconsistent semantics.

Yeek. Sounds like a defence Ollie North could've used. (-: --- WRS

• Binding the same variable twice in a single form
• From: barmar@Think.COM (Barry Margolin)

• Prev: telnet error
• Next: Re: Binding the same variable twice in a single form
• Index: SLUG Mailing list (1-Mar-90 to 31-May-90)
• Thread: SLUG Mailing list Index (1-Mar-90 to 31-May-90)