document examiner

• To: slug@Warbucks.AI.SRI.COM
• Subject: document examiner
• From: JFK@Bold-Eagle.Varian.Dialnet.Symbolics.Com (Joe F. Karnicky)
• Date: Mon, 12 Mar 90 12:10 PST

I agree with the various people who find the document examiner
to be *far* superior to the printed manuals (our 7.2 set
is still in shrinkwrap.)
	However, it seems to me that the organization of the
subject nodes within the examiner is currently much poorer
than it was under 6.1 (the first examiner release).

Joe Karnicky

• document examiner
• From: ai.gooch@MCC.COM (William D. Gooch)
• document examiner versus printed manuals
• From: lakin@csli.Stanford.EDU (Fred Lakin)

• Prev: Problems with X Remote Screen
• Next: document examiner
• Index: SLUG Mailing list (1-Mar-90 to 31-May-90)
• Thread: SLUG Mailing list Index (1-Mar-90 to 31-May-90)