SLUG mail archive
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Manuals: seconded again..
-
To: slug@Warbucks.AI.SRI.COM
-
Subject: Manuals: seconded again..
-
From: Spock@SAMSON.cadr.dialnet.symbolics.com (Mr. Spock)
-
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 90 08:46 PST
-
Character-Type-Mappings: (1 0 (NIL 0) (NIL :BOLD NIL) "CPTFONTCB") (2 0 (NIL 0) (NIL :ITALIC NIL) "CPTFONTI")
-
Fonts: CPTFONT, CPTFONTCB, CPTFONTI
-
In-Reply-To: <19900306144431.1.PAN@Athena.Pangaro.Dialnet.Symbolics.Com>
-
Internet-Address: SPOCK%samson.cadr.dialnet.symbolics.com@riverside.scrc.symbolics.com
-
Phone-Number: (209)586-7422
-
Snail-Mail-Address: American Microsystems Inc. (A wholly owned subsidiary of Gould Inc.) CAD Research Lab. P.O. Box 967 Twain Harte, CA 95383
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 90 09:44 EST
From: pan@Athena.Pangaro.Dialnet.Symbolics.Com (Paul Pangaro)
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 90 10:46:06+0900
From: kddlab!atr-la.atr.co.jp!myers@uunet.UU.NET (John K. Myers)
The idea of having each customer site fill out a form to request the
number of desired manuals is a good one. Please do this.
I for one require my own set of manuals, and will be upset otherwise.
John Myers~~
Absolutely concur with policy to 1lower 0the number, rather than
default to 1 for 5. I have 2 machines under software maintenance
in two different places; I don't know, how many do I get? I
certainly need 2, since (as others have said similarly) (1) printing from
the doc examiner is 2post hoc0 from my needs; (2) scanning paper is
far more pleasant for many things; etc.
Other opinions from users?
Best,
PANgaro
We have machines at 2 sites and our needs only require that we have a
complete manual set at each site. We probably only really need one
manual set because everyone usually asks me before looking in the
book(s). I'm sure that unless Symbolics adopts a "tell us how many you
need" policy that there will be unsatisfied customers no matter what
they do. And there will still be unsatisfied customers no matter what
they do.
Follow-Ups:
References:
Main Index |
Thread Index